Assessing Theories of Emotion in Political Science and Psychology: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

This article evaluates the status of theories of emotion within the contexts of political science and psychology in Pakistan, focusing on how emotional dynamics influence political behavior and decision-making. It examines the interplay between individual emotions and collective sentiments, particularly in relation to political events, social movements, and governance challenges in the country. The study analyzes existing theoretical frameworks, such as affective reasoning and emotional contagion, to understand their applicability to the unique political landscape of Pakistan, marked by issues such as conflict, social inequality, and identity politics. Through qualitative and quantitative analyses, the research highlights how emotions shape public opinion, voter behavior, and political engagement in Pakistani society. Additionally, it explores the implications of emotional theories for policy-making and governance, suggesting that a deeper understanding of emotional factors can enhance political strategies and improve democratic processes. Ultimately, the findings advocate for an interdisciplinary approach that integrates insights from both political science and psychology to address the complexities of emotion in Pakistan's political arena.